CLAT 2026 Preparation Plan – Click Here to Start Smart   |   Target CLAT 2026 Crash Course – Exam Date Out, Enroll Now   |   CG Judiciary Prelims Test Series – Exam Date Out, Join Now   |   CG Judiciary Prelims Preparation Strategy – Click Here to Begin









Home / Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita & Code of Criminal Procedure

Criminal Law

Rights of Victim

    «    »
 22-Jan-2024

Introduction

The prevention of victimization is an important part of the overall strategy in the direction and dissemination of relevant information to the potential victims can be much useful to achieve the objectives in this regard.

Victim

  • As per Section 2(wa) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) victim means a person who has suffered any loss or injury caused by reason of the act or omission for which the accused person has been charged and the expression victim includes his or her guardian or legal heir.
  • By the CrPC Amendment Act, 2008, the expression victim has for the first time has been defined in the Code.

Order to Pay Compensation

  • Section 357 of CrPC empowers the Criminal Court to grant compensation to the victim and to order the payment of costs of the prosecution. It states that -

(1) When a Court imposes a sentence of fine or a sentence (including a sentence of death) of which fine forms a part, the Court may, when passing judgment, order the whole or any part of the fine recovered to be applied—

(a) In defraying the expenses of properly incurred in the prosecution.

(b) In the payment to any person of compensation for any loss or injury caused by the offence, when compensation is, in the opinion of the Court, recoverable by such person in a Civil Court.

(c) When any person is convicted of any offence for having caused the death of another person or of having abetted the commission of such an offence, in paying compensation to the persons who are, under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 (13 of 1855), entitled to recover damages from the person sentenced for the loss resulting to them from such death.

(d) When any person is convicted of any offence which includes theft, criminal misappropriation, criminal breach of trust, or cheating, or of having dishonestly received or retained, or of having voluntarily assisted in disposing of, stolen property knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen, in compensating any bona fide purchaser of such property for the loss of the same if such property is restored to the possession of the person entitled thereto.

(2) If the fine is imposed in a case which is subject to appeal no such payment shall be made before the period allowed for presenting the appeal has elapsed, or, if an appeal is presented, before the decision of the appeal.

(3) When a Court imposes a sentence, of which fine does not form a part, the Court may, when passing judgment, order the accused person to pay, by way of compensation, such amount as may be specified in the order to the person who has suffered any loss or injury by reason of the act for which the accused person has been so sentenced.

(4) An order under this section may also be made by an Appellate Court or by the High Court or Court of Session when exercising its powers of revision.

(5) At the time of awarding compensation in any subsequent civil suit relating to the same matter, the Court shall take into account any sum paid or recovered as compensation under this section.

Victim Compensation Scheme

  • Section 357A of CrPC deals with the victim compensation scheme. This Section was inserted by the CrPC Amendment Act, 2008 in order to provide the State Government to prepare in co-ordination with the Central Government a scheme for the compensation of the victim or his dependents.
  • This Section states that-

(1) Every State Government in co-ordination with the Central Government shall prepare a scheme for providing funds for the purpose of compensation to the victim or his dependents who have suffered loss or injury as a result of the crime and who require rehabilitation.

(2) Whenever a recommendation is made by the Court for compensation, the District Legal Service Authority or the State Legal Service Authority, as the case may be, shall decide the quantum of compensation to be awarded under the scheme referred to in sub-section (1).

(3) If the trial Court, at the conclusion of the trial, is satisfied, that the compensation awarded under section 357 is not adequate for such rehabilitation, or where the cases end in acquittal or discharge and the victim has to be rehabilitated, it may make recommendation for compensation.

(4) Where the offender is not traced or identified, but the victim is identified, and where no trial takes place, the victim or his dependents may make an application to the State or the District Legal Services Authority for award of compensation.

(5) On receipt of such recommendations or on the application under sub-section (4), the State or the District Legal Services Authority shall, after due enquiry award adequate compensation by completing the enquiry within two months.

(6) The State or the District Legal Services Authority, as the case may be, to alleviate the suffering of the victim, may order for immediate first-aid facility or medical benefits to be made available free of cost on the certificate of the police officer not below the rank of the officer in charge of the police station or a Magistrate of the area concerned, or any other interim relief as the appropriate authority deems fit.

Treatment of Victims

  • Section 357C of CrPC contains provision in relation to the treatment of victims.
  • This section has been inserted on the recommendations of the Justice J.S Verma Committee.
  • This Section states that all hospitals, public or private, whether run by the Central Government, the State Government, local bodies or any other person, shall immediately, provide the first-aid or medical treatment, free of cost, to the victims of any offence covered under section 326A, 376, 376A, 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, 376DB or section 376E of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and shall immediately inform the police of such incident.

Case Law

  • In Manish Jalan v. State of Karnataka (2008), the Supreme Court held the quantum of compensation has to be determined by taking into consideration the nature of crime, injury suffered and the capacity of the convict to pay compensation. The amount of compensation has to be reasonable, which the person concerned is able to pay.