Strengthen your Judiciary preparation with our all-in-one Judiciary Foundation Course starting from 9th March | Available in English and Hindi medium.   |   Enrol in the Judiciary Foundation Live Online Batch starting 27th April at 6:15 PM | Available in Online & Offline Mode









Home / Current Affairs

Family Law

Wife Absolute Owner of Streedhan

    «
 01-Apr-2026

    Tags:
  • The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA)

Anamika Tiwari and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another 

"The wife has all rights to dispose of her streedhan at her own pleasure; neither the husband nor the in-laws have any control over it." 

Justice Chawan Prakash 

Source: High Court of Allahabad

Why in News? 

Justice Chawan Prakash of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, in the case of Anamika Tiwari and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another (2026), held that a legally wedded wife is the absolute owner of her streedhan and cannot be made to face criminal trial under Section 406 IPC for allegedly taking away her own property. 

  • The Court further held that while a husband may use the streedhan during times of distress, he carries a moral obligation to restore it or its equivalent value, and neither he nor other in-laws retain any legal control over such property.

What was the Background of Anamika Tiwari and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another (2026) Case? 

  • The application was filed by Anamika Tiwari and four others seeking quashing of a summoning order and the entire proceedings of a complaint case under Sections 323, 504, and 406 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 
  • The applicant-wife had married the opposite party-husband in April 2012, and her family had provided sufficient dowry at the time of marriage.  
  • Disputes arose thereafter, and she lodged an FIR against her husband and his family members under Sections 498-A and 323 IPC and under the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging demands for additional dowry. A charge sheet was submitted in December 2018 in this matter. 
  • Subsequently, in May 2022, a court directed the husband to pay monthly maintenance of Rs 4,000 to the wife and Rs 1,000 to her son. 
  • Following this, the husband filed a counter-complaint alleging that his wife and the other applicants had entered his house in September 2018 and taken away Rs 6,400 in cash, ornaments worth approximately Rs 1,50,000, and certain household articles.  
  • On the basis of this complaint and witness statements, the Magistrate passed a summoning order against the wife and her family members. The wife challenged this order before the High Court.

What were the Court's Observations? 

  • The Court examined Sections 405 and 406 IPC at the outset and noted that for an offence of criminal breach of trust to be made out, property must be entrusted to a person who subsequently and dishonestly misappropriates or converts it to her own use. 
  • The Court held that since a wife is the absolute owner of her streedhan — comprising all properties given to her before, at the time of, or after marriage — no such entrustment by the husband or his family can be said to exist. Consequently, no offence under Section 406 IPC could be made out against the applicant-wife for removing her own ornaments and property. 
  • The Court further clarified that streedhan does not become joint property of the husband and wife by virtue of the marriage, and the wife retains an unqualified right to dispose of it as she pleases. While a husband may use streedhan in times of need, this use carries with it a moral obligation to restore the property or its value — it does not confer any right of ownership or control upon him or the in-laws. 
  • Regarding the charges under Sections 323 and 504 against the remaining applicants, the Court found the allegations to be general and non-specific in nature. 
  • The Court also remarked that the summoning order had been passed in a casual manner, as the Magistrate had failed to properly apply the definitional requirements of criminal breach of trust under Section 405 IPC before issuing process. 
  • Accordingly, the summoning order was set aside and the entire proceedings against the wife and her relatives were quashed.

What is the Concept of Streedhan? 

About:  

  • The word Streedhan has been derived from the words ‘Stri’ meaning a woman and the word ‘dhana’ means property. 
  • Streedhan is whatever a women receives during her life time.  
  • It includes all movable, immovable property gifts etc. received by women prior to marriage, at the time of marriage, during childbirth and during her widowhood. 
  • Streedhan differs from Dowry in the way that it is the voluntary gift given to a woman before or after her marriage and has no element of coercion.  
  • Women have an absolute right over their Stridhan. 

Composition of Streedhan:  

  • Streedhan comprises of the following:  
    • Gifts made before the nuptial fire.  
    • Gifts made at the bridal procession.  
    • Gifts made in token of love, that is, those made by her father-in-law and mother-in-law and other elders.  
    • Gifts made by the father of the bride. 
    • Gifts made by the mother of the bride. 
    • Gifts made by the brother of the bride. 

Laws Relating to Streedhan: 

  • A woman’s right to her Streedhan is protected under law Section14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 r/w Section 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 , “even if it is placed in the custody of her husband or her in-laws, they would be deemed to be trustees and bound to return the same if and when demanded by her 
  • Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 provides for women right to her Streedhan in cases where she is a victim of domestic violence. The provisions of this law can be easily invoked for the recovery of Streedhan.The magistrate may direct the respondent to return to the possession of the aggrieved person her Streedhan or any other property or valuable security to which she is entitled.